Versión de HTML Básico
26
Mª Ángeles Muñoz Miguelsanz
Preservación hipotérmica del intestino delgado
experimentales utilizados. Ambas limitaciones hace necesaria
la precaución en la interpretación de los resultados. A pesar de
estas limitaciones, nuestro estudio contribuye a la necesidad
de replantear nuevos estudios en el diseño y mejora de nuevas
soluciones de preservación que cumplan los requerimientos de
la infusión intraluminal en la preservación del intestino delgado
y posterior éxito del trasplante. El empleo y modificación de
soluciones de amplio uso hospitalario (SS y RL) pueden constituir,
en nuestra opinión, en excelente punto de partida. Finalmente,
hasta donde sabemos, es pionero en la utilización de la MEB en la
valoración topográfica del daño tisular inducida por la isquemia fría.
REFERENCIAS
1. López Santamaría M, Hernández F. Indicaciones, técnicas y
resultados del trasplante de intestino delgado. Nutr Hosp 2007;22(supl
2):113-123.
2. Gondolesi G, Fauda M. Technical refinements in small bowel
transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2008;13(3):259-265.
3. Andrés Moreno AM, Ramos E, Hernández F, Encinas JL, Leal N,
Gámez ML, et al. Trasplante Intestinal: ¿en qué fase estamos? Cir Pediátr
2010;23(3):177-183.
4. Belzer FO, Southard D. Principles of solid-organ preservation by
cold storage. Transplantation 1988;45(4):673-676.
5. Oltean M, Joshi M, Herlenius G, Olausson M. Improved intestinal
preservation using an intraluminal macromolecular solution: evidence
from a rat model. Transplantation 2010;89(3):285-290.
6. McKeehen D, Toledo-Pereyra LH, Sonnino RE. Small bowel
preservation. In: Toledo-Pereyra LH, editor. Organ preservation for
transplantation. Austin: Landes Bioscence, 2010. pp:175-184.
7. DeRoover A, de Leval L, Gilmaire J, Detry O, Coimbra C, Boniver
J, et al. Luminal contact with University of Wisconsin solution improves
human small bowel preservation. Transplant Proc 2004;36:273-275.
8. Olson DW, Jijon H, Madsen KL, Al-Saguier M, Zeng J, Jewell LD
et al. Human small bowel storage: the role for luminal preservation
solutions. Transplantation 2003;76(4):709-714.
9. Schweizer E, Gassel AM, Deltz E, Schroeder P. A comparison
of preservation solutions for small bowel transplantation in the rat.
Transplantation 1994;57(9):1406-1408.
10. Rodriguez FJ, Toledo-Pereyra LH, Suzuki S. Total heterotopic
small bowel transplantation in the rat: technical considerations in the
procurement, preservation and transplantation of the graft .Gac Med Mex
1993;129(2):131-137.
11. Rodriguez FJ, Toledo-Pereyra LH, Cejalvo D, Lloris-Carsi J.
Role of neutrophils in the development of preservation injury after
small bowel preservation for transplantation in the rat. Transplant Proc
1993;25(6):3209.
12. Fabian MA, Bollinger RR, Wyble CW, Watkins WD, Canada AT.
Evaluation of solutions for small intestinal preservation. Biochemical
changes as a function of storage time. Transplantation 1991;52(5):794-
799.
13. Rodriguez FJ, Toledo-Pereyra LH, Suzuki S. Twenty-four-hours
total small bowel hypothermia storage preservation and transplantation
in the rat: a study of various preservation solutions. J Invest Surg 1994;
7(5):439-451
14. Taguchi T, Zorychta E, Guttman FM. Evaluation of UW solution
for preservation of small intestinal transplants in the rat. Transplantation
1992; 53(6):1202-1205
15. Salehi P, Zhu JZJ, Castillo EG, Avila J, Lakey J, Churchill TA.
Preserving themucosal barrier during small bowel storage. Transplantation
2003;76(6):911-917.
16. Schweizer E, Gassel A, Deltz E, Schroeder P. Morphologic and
histologic alterations after small bowel transplantation: A comparison of
different solutions. Transplant Proc 1992; 24(3):1087.
17. Kokudo Y, Furuya T, Takeyoshi I, Nakamura K, Zhang S, Murase
N, et al. Comparison of University of Wisconsin, Euro-Collins, and lactated
Ringer’s solutions in rat small bowel preservation for orthotopic small
bowel transplantation. Transplant Proc 1994;26(3):1492–1493.
18. Minor T, Vollmar B, Menger MD, Isselhard W. Cold preservation
of the small intestine with the new Celsior-solution. Transpl Int
1998;11(1):32-37.
19. OlteanM, Joshi M, Herlenius G, OlaussonM. Improved intestinal
preservation using an intraluminal macromolecular solution: Evidence
from a rat model. Transplantation 2010;89(3):285-290.
20. Montuenga L, Esteban FJ, Calvo A. Técnicas en histología y
biología celular. Barcelona: Elsevier España, 2009.
21. Roskott AMC, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Dijkstra G, Koudstaal LG,
Leuvenink HGD, Ploeg RJ. Small bowel preservation for intestinal
transplantation: a review Transpl Int 2011;24:107–131.
22. Li YS, Li JS, Li N, Jiang ZW, Zhao YZ, Li NY, et al. Evaluation of
various solutions for small bowel graft preservation. World J. Gastroenterol
1998; 4(2):140-143.
23. Leuvenink HGD, van Dijk A, freund RL, Ploeg RJ, van Goor H.
Luminal preservation of rat small intestine with University of Wisconsin or
Celsior solution. Transplant Proc 2005;37: 445–447.
24. DeRoover A, de Leval L, Gilmaire J, detry O, Boniver J, Honoré
P, et al. A new model for human intestinal preservation: comparison of
University of Wisconsin and Celsior preservation solutions. Transplant
Proc 2004;36:270–272.
25. Escalante JL, Del Río F. Preservación de órganos. Med Intensiva
2009;33(6):282-292.
26. Schlachter K, Kokotilo M, Carter J, Thiesen A, Ochs A, Khadaroo
RG, et al. Redefining the properties of an osmotic agent in an intestinal-
specific preservation solution. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16(45):5701-
5709.
27. KokotiloMS, Carter J, Thiesen A, ChenMH, Ochs A, Khadaroo RG,
Churchill TA. Optimizing the concentration of hydroxyethylstarch in a novel
intestinal-specific preservation solution. Cryobiology 2010;61(3):236-42.
28. Olson D, Stewart B, Carle M, Chen M, Madsen K, Zhu J, et al.
The importance of impermeant support in small bowel preservation: a
morphologic, metabolic and functional study. Am J Transplant 2001;1:236-
242.
29. Balaz P, Kudla M, Lodererova A, Oliverius, M, Adamec M.
Preservation injury of the small bowel graft: jejunum vs. ileum. Ann
Transplant 2007;12(1):15-18
30. Oltean M, Joshi M, Björkman E, Oltean S, Casselbrant A,
Herlenius G, et al. Intraluminal polyethylene glycol stabilizes tight
junctions and improves intestinal preservation in the rat. Am J Transplant
2012;12(8):2044–2051.