Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  153 / 64 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 153 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

153

Ismael Khouly, DDS, MS, PhD

Treatment Options for the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla

English language publications were excluded. The search was

limited to studies involving human subjects. Restrictions were not

placed regarding the type of study design.

RESULTS

A total of 15 articles from reviewed journal published in

English were collected from a search performed using Medline

and Pubmed at the Waldman Library at the NYUCD Kriser Dental

Center. The following guideline tables are the result of this

literature review (TABLES 1, 2).

DISCUSSION

Due to the improvement of surgical techniques and the

progress of research in thefieldof biomaterials, excellent outcomes

have been reported for implant-supported rehabilitations in the

atrophic posterior maxilla in the past years. (21,22) The most

commonly utilized augmentation method for maxillary sinus

reconstruction was first presented by Tatum 19772, and published

by Boyne and James in 19801, using a window through the lateral

wall of the alveolus for sinus access. The LWSFE technique has

been widely described in the literature and is recommended with a

residual bone height less than 4 to 5 mm. This procedure has been

shown to be highly predictable for implant therapy with an overall

implant survival rate well beyond 90%. 5,6,7,23 Advantages of the

lateral window (LWSFE) approach to the sinus include direct view

of the sinus cavity, access to the Schneiderian membrane, and an

appropriate graft material placement15 (Fig.1, 2). However, this

procedure presents the disadvantages of prolonged time, cost,

and morbidity for the patient. (24,25)

To reduce complications and trauma that may occur

using the lateral wall approach, different techniques have been

proposed. The transcrestal approach to the maxillary sinus

(BAOSFE) has been advocated as ‘minimally invasive’ because of

the undisturbed vascularization of the graft and less postoperative

morbidity.4,9 According to standard protocol, the osteotome

technique should be used when the ridge height is greater than

4 to 5 mm where implants are placed simultaneously with the

elevation of the sinus floor (Fig.3). (3,4) Recently, a systematic

review of the literature showed that crestal sinus lift can be an

effective treatment option, reporting a mean weighted survival

rate of 95% after 5 years of function.26 The same review also

showed that the majority of failures occurred during the first

year after treatment. However, limitations of this procedure

include: limited accessibility and visibility for elevation of the

sinus membrane and inability to diagnose and treat membrane

perforations. (27,28,10) When the membrane is lifted more than

3 mm, the risk of membrane perforation increases significantly.

(29,30) The use of an endoscope has been proposed to diagnose

the membrane perforation during BAOSFE, increasing the cost

and time of the procedure. (29,30) Thus, in cases where crestal

height is 4-7 mm and an implant length of 10-13 mm is desired,

the sinus membrane will be lifted greater than 3mm, increasing

the risk of membrane perforation. An additional complication

reported following the use of osteotomes is paroxysmal positional

vertigo. (9)

Residual Bone

Height (mm)

Procedure

<4

Lateral wall, staged approach (delayed

placement)*

4-7

OASA Technique

8-10

Osteotome Technique

Table 1. Treatment options for atrophic posterior maxilla for single

implant. *Simultaneous implant placement if primary stability is

achieved (V-Shape sinus).

Residual Bone

Height (mm)

Procedure

<4

Lateral wall, staged approach (delayed

placement)*

4-7

Lateral wall, simultaneous placement

8-10

Osteotome Technique

Table 2. Treatment options for atrophic posterior maxilla for

multiple implants. *Simultaneous implant placement if primary

stability is achieved (V-Shape sinus).

Fig. 1a. Intraoperative view of lateral wall of the maxillary sinus

with Full thickness flap; Fig. 1b: Osteotomy of lateral wall window.

Fig. 1c: Placement of bone graftmaterial in the sinus cavity; Fig. 1d:

Resorbable membrane secured over the lateral window.

Fig. 2. Paraxial CT scans of sinus taken pre and post surgery.