Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  20 / 68 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 20 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

20

SUPLEMENTO

Ecografía Dermatológica

Actual. Med.

2014; 99: (793). Supl. 20-68

revisión

Ambos signos indican mal pronóstico de estas enfermedades.

La fase inactiva o atrófica se caracteriza por:

1) Disminución del grosor de la dermis y del tejido celular

subcutáneo

2) Aumento del componente fibroso de la dermis e

hipodermis

3) Disminución de la vascularización.

b) Reacción inflamatoria crónica a cuerpo extraño (13-14)

(ver tabla 5)

c) Inflamación por proceso infeccioso subyacente (13-14)

(ver tabla 5)

BIBLIOGRAFÍA

1.

Ecografía aplicada a las enfermedades inflamatorias de la piel.

Manual de Ecografía Cutánea. Alfageme F. Amazon Ltd. Págs.

45-52.

2.

Johnson MA, Amstrong AW. Clinical and histologic diagnostic

guidelines for psoriasis: a critical review. Clin Rev Allergy

Inmunol. 2013;44:166-72

3.

Baran R. The burden of nail psoriasis: an introduction.

Dermatology. 2010;221 Suppl 1:1-5

4.

Gutierrez M, Wortsman X, Filippucci E, De Angelis R, Filosa

G, Grassi W. High-frequency sonography in the evaluation

of psoriasis: nail and skin involvement. J Ultrasound Med.

2009;28:1569-74.

5.

Esmann S, Jemec GB. Psychosocial impact of hidradenitis

suppurativa: a qualitative study. Acta Derm Venereol

2011;91:328-332.

6.

Hurley H. Axillary hyperhidrosis, apocrine bromhidrosis,

hidradenitis suppurativa, and familial benign pemphigus:

surgical approach. In: Roenigh R RH, ed. Dermatologic surgery

New York: Marcel Dekker; 1989:729-739.

7.

Canoui-Poitrine F, Revuz JE, Wolkenstein P

, et al.

Clinical

characteristics of a series of 302 French patients with

hidradenitis suppurativa, with an analysis of factors associated

with disease severity. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;61:51-57.

8.

Sartorius K, Emtestam L, Jemec GB

, et al.

Objective scoring

of hidradenitis suppurativa reflecting the role of tobacco

smoking and obesity. Br J Dermatol 2009;161:831-839.

9.

Sartorius K, Lapins J, Emtestam L

, et al.

Suggestions for

uniform outcome variables when reporting treatment effects

in hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2003;149:211-213.

10. Kimball AB, Jemec GB, Yang M, Kageleiry A, Signorovitch JE,

Okun MM, Gu Y, Wang K, Mulani P, Sundaram M. Assessing

the validity, responsiveness, and meaningfulness of hte

hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) as the

clinical endpoint for hidradenitis suppurativa treatment. Br J

Dermatol 2014.Epubmed Ahead to print.

11. Worstman X, Moreno C, Soto R, Arellano J, Pezo C, Worstman

J. Ultrasound in-depth characterization and staging of

hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatol surg 2013;12:1835-42.

12. Wortsman X, Revuz J, Jemec GB. Lymph nodes in hidradenitis

suppurativa. Dermatology 2009;219:22-4

13. Worstman X, Gutierrez M, Saavedra T, Honeyman J. The role

of ultrasound in rheumatic skin and nail lesions: a multi-

specialit approach. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30:739-48

14. Inflammatory skin diseases. In: Dermatologic ultrasound with

clinical and histologic correlations. Ximena Wortsman. Ed

Springer.. 2013.73-116