Revista nº 801

39 / 68

97 Miguel Angel Vilches Ferrón
Aspectos morfológicos en el desarrollo embrionario
integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation
potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after
oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England), 22(2), 548–57.
22. Meseguer, M., Herrero, J., Tejera, A., Hilligsøe, K. M., Ramsing,
N. B., & Remohí, J. (2011). The use of morphokinetics as a
predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod (Oxford,
England), 26(10), 2658–71.
23. Nagy, Z. P., Taylor, T., Elliott, T., Massey, J. B., Kort, H. I., & Shapiro,
D. B. (2005). Removal of lysed blastomeres from frozen-thawed
embryos improves implantation and pregnancy rates in frozen
embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril, 84(6), 1606–12.
24. Pelinck, M.-J., Hoek, A., Simons, A. H. M., Heineman, M. J., van
Echten-Arends, J., & Arts, E. G. J. M. (2010). Embryo quality
and impact of specific embryo characteristics on ongoing
implantation in unselected embryos derived from modified
natural cycle in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril, 94(2), 527–34.
25. Van Royen, E., Mangelschots, K., De Neubourg, D., Laureys, I.,
Ryckaert, G., & Gerris, J. (2001). Calculating the implantation
potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years
of age: a new model. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England), 16(2),
326–32. Retrieved from
pubmed/11157828.
26. Ziebe, S., Petersen, K., Lindenberg, S., Andersen, a G.,
Gabrielsen, a, & Andersen, a N. (1997). Embryo morphology
or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer
after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England),
12(7), 1545–9. Retrieved from
pubmed/9262293
27. Paternot, G., Debrock, S., De Neubourg, D., D`Hooghe, T.M,
Spiessens,C. (2013). Semi-automated morphometric analysis of
human embryos can reveal correlations between total embryo
volume and clinical pregnancy. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England);
28(3): 627–33.
28. ASEBIR. (2015). Criterios ASEBIR de Valoración Morfológica
de Oocitos, Embriones Tempranos y Blastocistos Humanos 3ª
Edición. Madrid. Góbalo.
29. Kong X., Yang S., Gong F., Lu C., Zhang S., Lu G., Lin G. (2016).
The Relationship between Cell Number, Division Behavior and
Developmental Potential of Cleavage Stage Human Embryos: A
Time-Lapse Study. PLoS One.14;11(4): e0153697. doi: 10.1371/
journal.pone.0153697. eCollection 2016.
30. Aisling A., Hannah P., Christina B., Ulrika S., Kersti L.(2016).
Conventionalmorphology performs better thanmorphokinetics
for prediction of live birth after day 2 transfer. Reproductive
BioMedicine Online;33:61-70.
31. Alikani, M., M., Cohen, J., Tomkin, G., Garrisi, JG., Mack, C., &
Scott, R.(1999). Human embryo fragmentation in vitro and its
implications for pregnancy and implantation. Fertil Steril, 71(5),
836–42.
32. Keltz, M. D., Skorupski, J. C., Bradley, K., & Stein, D. (2006).
Predictors of embryo fragmentation and outcome after
fragment removal in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril, 86(2),
321–4.
33. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi
J.(2003). Methodological index for non-randomized studies
(MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument.
ANZ J Surg;73:712–6.