Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  34 / 68 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

182

Juliana Girón Bastidas

Nuevos retos de la fabricacióndemucosaoralmediante técnicas de Ingeniería Tisular

Sciences [Internet]. Elsevier; 2015 [cited 2016 Jul 10]. p. 721–

31. Available from:

http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/

B9780123971579000771

33. Tra WMW, Spiegelberg L, Tuk B, Hovius SER, Perez-Amodio S.

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment of tissue-engineered mucosa

enhances secretion of angiogenic factors in vitro. Tissue

Eng Part A [Internet]. 2014 May [cited 2016 Jun 22];20(9-

10):1523–30. Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

pubmed/24320751

34. Perez-Amodio S, Tra WMW, Rakhorst HA, Hovius SER, van

Neck JW. Hypoxia preconditioning of tissue-engineered

mucosa enhances its angiogenic capacity in vitro. Tissue

Eng Part A [Internet]. 2011 Jun [cited 2016 Jun 17];17(11-

12):1583–93. Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

pubmed/21303226

35. Bayar GR, Kuo S, Marcelo CL, Feinberg SE. In Vitro

Development of a Mucocutaneous Junction for Lip

Reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2016 Apr 13

[cited 2016 Jun 18]; Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.

gov/pubmed/27160362

36. Peña I, Junquera LM, Llorente S, De Villalaín L, De Vicente

JC, Llames S. Clinical outcomes after the use of complete

autologous oral mucosa equivalents: Preliminary cases.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol [Internet].

Elsevier; 2012;113(5):e4–11. Available from:

http://dx.doi

.

org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.07.030

37. Izumi K, Neiva RF, Feinberg SE. Intraoral grafting of tissue-

engineered human oral mucosa. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants

[Internet]. 2014;28(5):e295–303. Available from: http://

www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=41934

71&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

38. Almela T, Brook IM, Moharamzadeh K. Development of three-

dimensional tissue engineered bone-oral mucosal composite

models. J Mater Sci Mater Med [Internet]. 2016 Apr [cited

2016 Jun 17];27(4):65. Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.

nih.gov/pubmed/26883949

39. Amemiya T, Nakamura T, Yamamoto T, Kinoshita S,

Kanamura N. Immunohistochemical study of oral epithelial

sheets cultured on amniotic membrane for oral mucosal

reconstruction. Biomed Mater Eng [Internet]. 2010 [cited

2016 Jun 30];20(1):37–45. Available from:

http://www.ncbi.

nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20448302

40. Rouabhia M, Allaire P. Gingival mucosa regeneration in

athymic mice using in vitro engineered human oral mucosa.

Biomaterials [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2010;31(22):5798–

804.

Available

from:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.

biomaterials.2010.04.004

41. Peña I, Junquera LM, Meana Á, García E, Aguilar C, Fresno MF.

In vivo behavior of complete human oral mucosa equivalents:

characterization in athymic mice. J Periodontal Res [Internet].

2011 Apr [cited 2016 Jun 27];46(2):214–20. Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21348871

42. Ayvazyan A, Morimoto N, Kanda N, Takemoto S, Kawai K,

Sakamoto Y, et al. Collagen-gelatin scaffold impregnated with

bFGF accelerates palatal wound healing of palatal mucosa in

dogs. J Surg Res [Internet]. Elsevier Inc; 2011;171(2):e247–57.

Available from:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.059

43. Kinikoglu B, Hemar J, Hasirci V, Breton P, Damour O. Feasibility

of a porcine oral mucosa equivalent: a preclinical study. Artif

Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol [Internet]. 2012 Aug

[cited 2016 Jun 27];40(4):271–4. Available from:

http://www

.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22309108

44. Qi F, Yoshida T, Koike T, Aizawa H, Shimane T, Li Y, et al.

Construction and characterization of human oral mucosa

equivalent using hyper-dry amniotic membrane as a matrix.

ArchOral Biol [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2016;65:26–34. Available

from:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.01.011